Local meaning-negotiation, activity types, and the current-discourse-space model
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Meaning Negotiation In Dialogue
F o r t h e s a k e o f e f f e c t i v e c o n m m i c a t i o n o f m a n m a c h i n e t y p e , w h a t s eems n e c e s s a r y i s t o f i n d m e a n s t o d e a l w i t h c o m p l e x l a n g u a g e p r o b l e m s i n ways t h a t w o u l d g u a r a n t e e i t s c o r r e c t a n a l y s i s a n d s y n t h e s i s . Such p r o b l e m s c a n b e b e t t e r u n d e r s t o o d wh...
متن کاملMeaning Negotiation and Communicative Rationality
Settling disputes, even disputes about meaning, by third party arbitration is different from settling them by negotiation. Moreover, disputes can be settled by a procedure in which the disputing parties follow a protocol that prohibits them from simply following their original aims. They can collectively constitute an arbitrator. This provides an alternative model for resolving differences in m...
متن کاملMeaning Negotiation as Inference
Meaning negotiation (MN) is the general process with which agents reach an agreement about the meaning of a set of terms. Artificial Intelligence scholars have dealt with the problem of MN by means of argumentations schemes, beliefs merging and information fusion operators, and ontology alignment but the proposed approaches depend upon the number of participants. In this paper, we give a genera...
متن کاملMeaning Negotiation: an invitation
The development of distributed applications over large networks of computers raises the issue of semantic heterogeneity between autonomously developed sources of information or service providers. If, on the one hand, it is generally recognized that we need a semantic layer to provide more and more complex services, on the other hand it is clear that such a layer requires the ability to “bridge”...
متن کاملMisunderstanding and the negotiation of meaning
Most computational accounts of dialogue have assumed that once listeners have interpreted an utterance, they never change this interpretation. However, human interactions routinely violate this assumption. This is because people are necessarily limited in how much information they can make explicit. As a result, misunderstandings might occur--discourse participants might differ in their beliefs...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Language and Cognition
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1866-9808,1866-9859
DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2015.21